Pages

Friday, April 20, 2012

War, Welfare & Democracy

Here it is - the cover of my book which will be out in January 2013.  This passage from the final chapter explains the painting.

The fears of our forefathers are creeping towards reality.  These fears, which our Founding Fathers had in mind when they placed their limitations on our government, also produced one of the most beautifully haunting series of paintings in American art.  Thomas Cole, a famed painter and founder of the “Hudson River School” of artists, created a cycle of paintings labeled The Course of Empire in the 1830s.  His work was inspired in part by a verse of Lord Byron’s nearly contemporaneous poetry.
There is the moral of all human tales;
Tis but the same rehearsal of the past.
First freedom and then Glory - when that fails,
Wealth, vice, corruption - barbarism at last.
And History, with all her volumes vast,
Hath but one page...
The cycle of five paintings depicted a landscape’s transition from the state of nature, through a pastoral era, to the Consummation of Empire.  In this grandiose scene, the emperor and his retinue stand in their pomp on a bridge.  In the background, we see the ships of commerce and the decadent temples and buildings they paid for.  The next scene is entitled Destruction, as armies battle over the same bridge, which has begun to give way under their weight.  Only warships ply the waters now.  Finally, Desolation prevails as nature begins to reclaim the abandoned ruins.
Cole was painting with American hubris in mind.  His notes lay plain his fears of the coming tragedy of the Civil War.  “Americans are too fond of attributing the great prosperity of the country to their own good government instead of seeing the source of it in the unbounded resources & favorable political opportunities of the nation.  It is with sorrow that I anticipate the downfall of this republican government; its destruction will be a death blow to Freedom, for if the Free government of the U[nited] States cannot exist a century where shall we turn?” The United States did survive, but only after a titanic clash that left scars to this day.  It should give us pause to hear the growing stridence of voices calling for radical solutions to the problems facing America and other established democracies.  Furthermore, our discord undermines the power of example as we hope to lead others away from illiberal politics and state capitalism toward our more liberal model.

10 comments:

  1. It was a combination of our form of government inherited from Britain [England] and our vast natural resources and river system protected by two oceans and the Royal Navy that led to our great prosperity. The war waged by the North to impose its will upon the South does indeed reverberate to this day and to what outcome no one knows.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sincere congratulations on the achievement.

    Best
    ADTS

    ReplyDelete
  3. Second ADTS's congragulations.

    "It should give us pause to hear the growing stridence of voices calling for radical solutions to the problems facing America and other established democracies."

    What does this mean?

    - Madhu

    ReplyDelete
  4. Or congratulations. Sorry, I will never proofread comments. It just seems like a waste of time for me. Which I just wasted more of....

    - Madhu

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wonderful cover. Can you explain what the "end of history" is though? I'm not sure if everyone knows...it may make a nice blog.

    JAT

    ReplyDelete
  6. All,
    Thanks much for the congrats.

    JAT,
    I offered this as a brief explanation in a note in the first chapter. I'll post Monday or Tuesday with a longer explanation.:
    The "end of history," a concept made famous by Francis Fukuyama's 1989 essay refers to the idea that the political history of humanity is progressing toward a single form of government, that being liberal democracy in Fukuyama's argument. This idea builds off of the ideas of philosophers such as Georg Hegel that argued that human history was a struggle between slave and master, thesis and antithesis, which would progress in waves until a stasis was found and history - in effect - ended. This is not to suggest that time would end, but just that the major events of history would fade away when slave and master became one. Karl Marx built upon this idea with his concept of dialectical struggle. The end of the Cold War made it seem that liberal democracy was poised to sweep the world, creating a lasting peace in which people, through their electoral power, would become their own masters and end the history of struggle.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Peter, have you read David Bell's "The First Total War"?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Just to be nitpicky, I'd put forth that Hegel per Kojeve per Fukuyama argued human history was a struggle, by people, for recognition, as people, by other people. But I'm looking forward to reading the upcoming post. ;-)

    Best
    ADTS

    ReplyDelete
  9. I will also just note that I find the Hegel-Kojeve-Fukuyama recognition heuristic very powerful, and that it may relate well to both the Kipling/Tommy post on this blog, as well as the (by now prolific) "Disruptive Thinker" posts and debate(s) on SWJ (and pertinent to still other topics as well?).

    Best
    ADS

    ReplyDelete
  10. Peter,

    Fantastic choice from Cole's Course of Empire. Cole and the Hudson School in general expanded the era's thinking on Man in Nature vs. Man Against Nature which underscored and influenced the politics, philosophy, and science of the 19th century and beyond, particularly vis perceptions of what might be "new" about America as opposed to Europe and were in concert with the ideas, broadly, explored by Emerson, Hawthorne, Thoreau, James Fenimore Cooper and, arguably, Melville. All were rather theatrical in various ways. An era of big ideas and actions.

    Your first is still in my queue but looking forward to this latest.

    Best/Dave

    ReplyDelete